🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a pending law that include lowering the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, the company recommends this be reduced to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than one year after the law is enacted.

International experts specifically advises a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for different infractions “extending from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia states the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We reside in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Further, the corporation engages in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which provide for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, adding that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.