🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances is that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.